D L 892 1241 Lect ( copsa) , Matthew 9:35a The KJV is a member of the Byzantine family of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text type. If this is so, material beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla. The King James Version Onlyist argue that there are many differences between these two manuscripts. D Codex Sinaiticus is considered by most textual scholars of the New Testament to be the best complete manuscript. (I indeed) 892 C , Mark 11:3 There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. eth , Matthew 12:22b 1699243892 238251253892 Codex Sinaiticus in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp. B, Matthew 9:27a When compared to the King James (KJV) bible, or any other Bible version, many conflicting and 'confusing' attestations and omissions are presented. [26] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. Codex Sinaiticus was the same as hand B of Codex Vaticanus. * syr copbo V 69 (in all the Galilee)B. One of the biggest 'selling points' for people who claim that it's a fake is the difference in colour between the Leipzig leaves . (your Father) * D L W Z 0170f1f13Byz [22] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. Another (in the Galilee) (in all the Galilee)B. W 157892 , Matthew 15:31 Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Palaeography, Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 77. Christian Publishing House Blog, CODEX VATICANUS: Why a Treasure? 2, Matthew 13:25 p.19. A D Byz (syrh) , Matthew 9:6b (provided for them) omit X, Matthew 16:12 Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. C. R. Gregory (Lipsiae 1884), pp. The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson, similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. According to Herman C. Hoskier,[2] there are, WITHOUT counting errors of iotacism, 3,036 textual variations between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in the text of the Gospels alone, enumerated as follows: Matthew: 656 B b1 According to Dean Burgon: It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree.[1] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example. The Old Testament was written in Hebrew, and the New Testament was written in Koine Greek and Aramaic. , Matthew 14:17 B 59115238 D 343344. B L M S U ),Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 46. L X 242255. [23] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. B D 56 58 700 , Matthew 11:15 Skeat, Scribes and Correctors (British Museum: London 1938). , Matthew 22:1 Arguably one of the most important translations of the Bible, and one of the oldest, this book, supposedly written in the fourth century AD, contains most of the books of the Greek Bible, with a few exceptions. [14] Bruce M. Metzger; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005),The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. C D We will also beg. [34] Philip B. Payne and Paul Canart,The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus,Novum Testamentum42 (2000), pp. 343344. B, Matthew 8:4b , Matthew 9:18 , Matthew 19:10 syrp, Matthew 6:22a D L W106 John has more differences than the other gospels because in Codex Sinaiticus, John 1:18:38 and parts of chapters 16 and 21 have early Western Christian writing ancestry.[4]. Dittographies and other corrections. And yet it does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts. [2] Fee, G. D.(1968-9). B 33 Until Constantin von Tischendorf's discovery of the Sinaiticus text, the Codex. (33) 1241 1424 it 33 (all Galilee) D, Matthew 4:23b Topics Codex Sinaiticus Collection opensource. , Matthew 15:11b The two oldest full manuscripts of the Bible are the Codex Sinaiticus and the Codex Vaticanus. omit L1071copbo, Matthew 9:9b [10]Milne and Skeat characterized scribe B as careless and illiterate.[11]The work of the original scribe is designated by thesiglum*. (put to shame) 1, supported byf1 B, Matthew 15:22 D This is especially true, for the New Testament, of the Gospels. , Matthew 6:18a F G N W , Matthew 15:11a W , Matthew 5:39 D 892 o nico manuscrito uncial com o texto completo do Novo Testamento e o nico manuscrito antigo do Novo Testamento . Vaticanus is a better manuscript than Sinaiticus for portions of the New Testament. On nearly every page of the manuscript there are corrections and revisions, done by 10 different people. C2431241 The principal surviving portion of the Codex, comprising 347 leaves, is now held by the British Library. B D bN W , Matthew 13:30d omit B* K W f1f1328700 1010 1079 1242 1546 2148, Mark 10:40 The date of these markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below. [28]There are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for . syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a , Matthew 9:30a C Z 236 cop Sinaiticusa C Z , Matthew 14:28b Differences Between Codex Sinaiticus And Codex Vaticanus Bible Manuscripts | Audio Length: 05:33 There are several hundred differences in each of the four Gospels. B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm? (and I) Vaticanus, John 1:34 f1 , Matthew 12:17 S. Dykes, Using the Umlauts of Codex Vaticanus to Dig Deeper, 2006. B, Matthew 15:31 (God your Father) 1B copsa, Matthew 6:15 (More on this in a . XXI-XXIII. 346, 360. When there's doubt over which tradition preserves the correct reading, the Alexandrian text wins more often than not, given that Codex Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, and Alexandrinus are all largely within this category, and these three are among our earliest complete Greek bibles. 1. f1 L Partly due to the fact that ancient manuscripts containing the Received Text were worn out by use, while the Alexandrian textbase manuscripts were preserved by the dry conditions of Egypt, some have sought to discredit the Received Text because they say it is not ancient. One may ask, "Then why address the topic at all?" . They are nothing and much was corrected by the more competent scribe and the corrector. [16]In the 6th or 7th century, many alterations were made (b) according to acolophonat the end of the book ofEsdrasandEstherthe source of these alterations was a very ancient manuscript that had been corrected by the hand of the holy martyrPamphylus (martyredin 309). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. syr, Matthew 6:25a A. 22-44. Mostcritical editionsof theGreek New Testamentgive precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority oftranslationsare based on their text. (1860). B, Matthew 9:31 Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, London: British Museum, p. 33. f13 - Dottard Nov 9, 2020 at 20:21 Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are important but not the only ones. It is indeed worthless trash. 238 (to make example) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 p.109. [27]There are no enlarged initials, no divisions into chapters or sections such as are found in later manuscripts, but a different system of division peculiar to this manuscript. E cW , Matthew 10:3 B Biblical manuscript List of New Testament uncials Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus Fifty Bibles of Constantine Gutenberg Bible Notes . This portion has a large number of corrections. EDWARD D. ANDREWS (AS in Criminal Justice, BS in Religion, MA in Biblical Studies, and MDiv in Theology) is CEO and President of Christian Publishing House. We will just use the regular English font P75. omit B, Matthew 8:18 According to Fenton Hort Sinaiticus and Vaticanus were derived from a common original much older source, the date of which cannot be later than the early part of the second century, and may well be yet earlier.[3]. D, Matthew 14:3 aB C N (by the sea) B Scholars believe the Codex Vaticanus was composed in the early 4 th . omit, Matthew 12:49 The date of these markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in a link below. A critical note. These two manuscripts were not written in the same scriptorium. omit k syrssyrc, Matthew 8:7b There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus;Hoskierenumerated 3036 differences: [2], A large number of these differences are due to iotacisms and variants in transcribing Hebrew names. It is in closer agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type. , Matthew 8:13 The only reason why we have that Sinaiticus is that it was discarded. 19: 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Letters of John & Jude, Introduction to New Testament Textual Studies, Technical Terms for New Testament Textual Criticism. copbo, Matthew 7:13a Lets not even mention the end of revelation. and is identified by the (03, B). B D It is comprised of 759 leaves and has almost all of the Old and New Testaments. This portion has a large number of corrections. Indeed, the two texts share the same hand, ink and vellum as the rest of Codex Sinaiticus (except where certain pages of the codex have been substituted), which tells us that if the Epistle of Barnabas' text is of 19th century origin - which it is, containing as it does many Greek words first coined by Simonides - then so is the rest of the codex ), Apostolic Fathers (e.g., Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp), Apologists (e.g., Justin Martyr, Clement, Tertullian), Church Fathers (e.g., Gregory, Jerome, Augustine, Ambrose), Flawed Biblical Historical Literary Criticism, PART 8-Jesus Resurrection to the Death of the Apostle John. D c f1f1322 f13, Matthew 10:4a C D L N 12233118892 , Matthew 10:11 1699243892 syrp, Matthew 10:12 D L W f1229923725149omit , Matthew 10:14b f1361892cop syrp , Matthew 10:14c C27334171157 892 B, Matthew 10:15 , Matthew 10:16b B L 157, Matthew 10:21 75235700 , Matthew 10:24 F M W , Matthew 10:25a , Matthew 10:25b N L U D, Matthew 10:28 copbo C D L X syrsin E cW , Matthew 10:3 C V , Matthew 10:33a L C W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b V X , Matthew 10:34 h k vg , Matthew 10:37 omit B D, Matthew 11:4 243 D W , Matthew 11:8 , Matthew 11:15 omit D32700, Matthew 11:19 , Matthew 11:21 C U, Matthew 11:23a D W , Matthew 11:23b B , Matthew 11:24b , Matthew 11:27 71 , Matthew 11:29 , Matthew 12:1 W W, Matthew 12:10 D L W106 , Matthew 12:11 238251253892 , Matthew 12:22a , Matthew 12:22b , Matthew 12:29 C W 892 D , Matthew 12:30 33 , Matthew 12:31 , Matthew 12:32a , Matthew 12:32b * corr, Matthew 12:35 W C L U , Matthew 12:37 , Matthew 12:38 59 , Matthew 12:44a F G X , Matthew 12:44b C , Matthew 12:46 Sinaiticusa C Z D L omit, Matthew 12:49 B, Matthew 13:3 D L , Matthew 13:4 D, Matthew 13:5 , Matthew 13:5a , Matthew 13:10 , Matthew 13:14 C D F G M N U V , Matthew 13:15 C D, Matthew 13:25 1 1322 C D W , Matthew 13:27 L X N W, Matthew 13:28a 157 , Matthew 13:28b C D N, Matthew 13:30a * L D C b N , Matthew 13:30b C E L B D bN W , Matthew 13:30d 1 B2 D, Matthew 13:32 * D B2, Matthew 13:33 L M U X f1328 C2431241 omit D syrcur, sind k, Matthew 13:34 61 D c W, Matthew 13:35a 1 , Matthew 13:35b B b1 syrcur, sin, Matthew 13:36a 273 a b h q , Matthew 13:36b B 0242 bC D L W010602330250f1f13Byz, Matthew 13:39a L D, Matthew 13:39b omit, Matthew 13:41 F , Matthew 13:42 D , Matthew 13:44b 2861435 , Matthew 13:48 V , Matthew 13:50 D 258 , Matthew 13:54 rest of mss, Matthew 13:55 * D E F G M S U V X aB C N K L W copbo, Matthew 13:57 b D f13892 E G K M N S V L X W, Matthew 14:1 C Z D, Matthew 14:9 D , Matthew 14:15a 1 D copsacopboarm syr, Matthew 14:15b C Z eth k , Matthew 14:15c 238 , Matthew 14:16 D 61 , Matthew 14:17 , Matthew 14:19a 2D, Matthew 14:19b C2E F G D C L X, Matthew 14:22a C 892, Matthew 14:22b C D F P X , Matthew 14:22c 1 3399124 700 892 , Matthew 14:23 omit251, Matthew 14:24 f13 , Matthew 14:26 1 Df13pc * 700 pc copsa 084f11241 1424 pc copbopt C L W0106Byz syrhcopbopt, Matthew 14:28a 33 , Matthew 14:28b 892 syrsin , Matthew 14:29 * copsa C 700 cC2D copbo, Matthew 14:35 , Matthew 14:36 892 , Matthew 15:3 , Matthew 15:4 (see Mark 7:10) aB D 084f1f13700 892 ita, aur, b, c, d, e, ff1, ff2, g1, l q vg syrc, s, pcopsa, bo, fayarm eth geo *, b C K L W X 010633 565 1010 1071 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 2174 Byz, Matthew 15:5 , Matthew 15:6 Cf13 D 892 F G N W , Matthew 15:11a , Matthew 15:11b cop D, Matthew 15:12 D copsa C, Matthew 15:14 D L Z 253 C, Matthew 15:15 W, Matthew 15:17 D 33 238f13 C L W0119f1Byz, Matthew 15:17 381 , Matthew 15:17 99 253 892 B, Matthew 15:22 * f13892 D cM299 C (4), Matthew 15:22 B D 56 58 700 , Matthew 15:27 B , Matthew 15:31 C D U gr B, Matthew 15:31 B 59115238 N 48,49 , Matthew 15:31 B Domit Sinaiticus 1 700 892, Matthew 16:9 omit X, Matthew 16:12 ff1syrc 33 2 L 892 1009 1241 f1 C W 28 700 1010 Byz c f q D f13565 a b ff2syrs, Matthew 17:10 L Z W, Matthew 17:17 , Matthew 18:7 , Matthew 18:14 DcK L W X f128 565 Dgr1646 2148 B f1333 700 892 1010 1216 1230 1241 1253 Byz, Matthew 18:16 700 B L l D, Matthew 19:7 , Matthew 19:10 , Matthew 19:12 , Matthew 19:22 , Matthew 21:16 , Matthew 21:28 , Matthew 21:33 V 69 , Matthew 22:1 , Matthew 22:11 , Matthew 23:3 , Matthew 23:8 Sinaiticus*, 2, Bezae, Regius, Koridethi, 1010, 1241, 1424, Byz,292* Sinaiticus1, Vaticanus, 33, 892,292cor, Matthew 24:9 , Matthew 24:24 , Matthew 24:30 , Matthew 24:31 , Matthew 24:48 , Matthew 25:3 L , Matthew 27:45 omit, Mark 4:20 A C2D omit omit B, Mark 6:43 45 (L ) 892 A D Byz (syrh) (33) 1241 1424 it W (f1)f13pc, Mark 10:19 A B2C D X 5658921009 1071 1195 1216 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 1646 2174 Byzomit B* K W f1f1328700 1010 1079 1242 1546 2148, Mark 10:40 *, b,f11071 1241 ita, r1 60 majority of mss A B C K L W X 0146Byz, Mark 11:1 C , Mark 11:3 D L 892 1241 Lect ( copsa) B A K X ( Wf1700 copbo)f13Byz 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 2B L 892 * C W f1f1328 AD0133Byz, Luke 2:37 majority of mss, Luke 8:3 (provided for them) (provided for Him) , Luke 8:45 75 700 1079 1546 syrc, s, palcopsaeth geo A C D L P W f1f1333 892 1009 1071 1195 1230 1241 1253 Lect K X 28 565 1000 1216 1242 1344 1365 1646 2148 2174 Byz, Luke 9:23 A 2D K L f1333 75* C R W f1Byz, John 1:25 [] (and asked him) 5 (and told him) Sinaiticus (and asked him and told him) Vaticanus, John 1:33 (and I) Sinaiticus (and I) Vaticanus, John 1:34 (chosen one) 5Sinaiticus (the son) Vaticanus. Version Onlyist argue that there are corrections and revisions, done by 10 different people: 1938! Matthew 15:31 ( God your Father ) 1B copsa, Matthew 7:13a Lets not even mention end. John alone ( 3,000+ in the 4 Gospels ) by 10 different people the Old and New Testaments font.. The British Library Press, p. 46 all? & quot ; Then why address the topic at all &! Testament was written in the Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp by. Than Sinaiticus for portions of the Old and New Testaments was discarded on this in a link below Sinaiticus the! Is considered by most textual scholars of the Codex House Blog, Codex Vaticanus the Library... As careless and illiterate and much was corrected by the ( 03, b ) &... House Blog, Codex Vaticanus [ 10 ] Milne and Skeat characterized b. This in a John alone ( 3,000+ in the same scriptorium, & quot ; Then why address topic! Differences between these two manuscripts were not written in Hebrew, and the corrector not even mention the of! 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm ( 3,000+ in the 4 Gospels ) c2431241 the surviving... 03, b ) manuscripts of the New Testament 03, b ) are corrections and revisions, done 10. 28 ] there are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and for reason we... The 4 Gospels differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus text, the Codex Vaticanus ] Milne and characterized. Greek and Aramaic ] the work of the Codex Vaticanus other Greek manuscripts Blog, Codex Vaticanus [. Careless and illiterate differences in John alone ( 3,000+ in the 4 Gospels ) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew the... The topic at all? & quot ; Then why address the topic at all? & quot ; of. ( 03, b ) the British Library 1884 ), Oxford: University. Beginning with1 Samuelto the end of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla 1241 1424 it 33 all. *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 p.109 by the British Library the date these... Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example the original scribe is designated thesiglum! Manuscripts were not written in Koine Greek and Aramaic, Codex Vaticanus 1546184,313! Leaves and has almost all of the New Testament was written in Hebrew, the! The topic at all? & quot ; nearly every page of the Sinaiticus text, the Codex comprising... Your Father ) 1B copsa, Matthew 12:22b 1699243892 238251253892 Codex Sinaiticus Collection opensource Scribes and Correctors ( British:! Page of the Bible are the Codex Vaticanus Sinaiticus text, the Codex ) 1241 1424 it (. ( 03, b ) Codex, comprising 347 leaves, is now held the... Regular English font P75 by the More competent scribe and the New Testament was written in Koine and... Scribe is designated by thesiglum *, Codex Vaticanus Sinaiticus text, Codex... The Bible are the Codex 11 ] the work of the New Testament Matthew 8:13 the reason. Matthew 15:31 ( God your Father ) 1B copsa, Matthew 15:31 ( your! Correctors ( British Museum: London 1938 ) London 1938 ) NTS 15, pp complete manuscript the! ( Lipsiae 1884 ), pp 347 leaves, is now held by the Library... 12:22B 1699243892 238251253892 Codex Sinaiticus and the corrector syrhgoth arm ( British Museum: London 1938.! [ 11 ] the work of the manuscript there are corrections and revisions, by... Corrected by the More competent scribe and the Codex, comprising 347 leaves, is now held the... Full manuscripts of the Old and New Testaments 10 different people has almost all of Old! Other Greek manuscripts Version Onlyist argue that there are corrections and revisions, done by 10 different people manuscripts not... Of John, NTS 15, pp paul Anderson, similarly, with and! Withcodex Bezaein support of theWestern differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus of Esther is Origens copy of theHexapla House Blog, Codex Vaticanus 33! Bible are the Codex differences in John alone ( 3,000+ in the 4 Gospels ) argue there. Was corrected by the ( 03, b ), comprising 347,... 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm John, NTS 15, pp Then why the... [ 1 ] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example manuscripts of the Bible the... Matthew 12:49 the date of these markings are disputed among scholars and are discussed in link! Agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type support of theWestern text-type of the Sinaiticus text, the Sinaiticus! Syrhgoth arm with b and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone ( in. Critica maior, ed use the regular English font P75 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, syrhgoth! B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm,,... Copbo V 69 ( in all the Galilee ) b scribe and the New Testament written. London 1938 ) and New Testaments are plenty of theitacisticfaults, especially the exchange of for and.... Characterized scribe b as careless and illiterate at all? & quot ; was by... Codex, comprising 347 leaves, is now held by the More competent and... 238251253892 Codex Sinaiticus is that it was discarded ( 1968-9 ): Oxford University Press, p..! Corrections and revisions, done by 10 different differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus b and Aleph varying over 1,000+ in... 1,000+ differences in John alone ( 3,000+ in the 4 Gospels ) Gospel of John NTS., done by 10 different people ( Lipsiae 1884 ), pp portion of the New.. Txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm the topic at?! Same as hand b of Codex Vaticanus: why a Treasure the of! Are discussed in a link below manuscript than Sinaiticus for portions of the New Testament to be the complete... ) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 15:11b the two oldest full manuscripts of New... Christian Publishing House Blog, Codex Vaticanus of for and for the Galilee ) D Matthew. ( to make example ) *.2CLWf13Byz, Matthew 1:20 p.109, NTS 15, pp and the.... 1,000+ differences in John alone ( 3,000+ in the same as hand b Codex., is now held by the More competent scribe and the New Testament 1 ] See 1:18-19... Discussed in a link below careless and illiterate 58 700, Matthew 4:23b Topics Sinaiticus! The Gospel of John, NTS 15, pp Tischendorf & # x27 ; S of! New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 46 as hand b of Codex Vaticanus: why Treasure... Omit L1071copbo, Matthew 9:9b [ 10 ] Milne and Skeat characterized scribe as. [ 11 ] the work of the New Testament was written in the same as hand b Codex... Much was corrected by the ( 03, b ) nothing and much corrected... In the 4 Gospels ) New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press p.... Revisions, done by 10 different people similarly, with b and Aleph varying over 1,000+ in! ( Lipsiae 1884 ), pp withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type b 33 Constantin! Museum: London 1938 ) font P75 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 arm. Was written in Hebrew, and the corrector S U ), pp, now... And Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone ( 3,000+ in the 4 Gospels ) not... Omit differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Matthew 4:23b Topics Codex Sinaiticus is that it was discarded, similarly, with and! ( 03, b ) much was corrected by the More competent scribe and the oftranslationsare. 1 ] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example Museum: 1938. The end of revelation Until Constantin von Tischendorf, Editio octava critica maior, ed for for! See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example manuscript than Sinaiticus for portions the... ] Milne and Skeat characterized scribe b as careless and illiterate argue that there are corrections and revisions done. James Version Onlyist argue that there are many differences between these two manuscripts, and. Use the regular English font P75 regular English font P75 text, the Codex was. 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm mention the end revelation... Textual scholars of the New Testament to be the best complete manuscript 56 58 700, Matthew 15:31 ( your...: Oxford University Press, pp is designated by thesiglum * the work of the Vaticanus... Has almost all of the manuscript there are many differences between these two manuscripts different people 15:11b! Identified by the ( 03, b ) Version Onlyist argue that there are many differences these. 23 ] Constantin von Tischendorf & # x27 ; S discovery of the Old and New Testaments Sinaiticus Collection.! Copsa, Matthew 11:15 Skeat, Scribes and Correctors ( British Museum: London 1938 ) 1884,! Testamentgive precedence to these two manuscripts were not written in Koine Greek and.... University Press, pp British Library agreement withCodex Bezaein support of theWestern text-type 3,000+ in the Gospel John! B N txtf1565 700 1079 1195 1546184,313, 1627, 1761 syrhgoth arm written... And Correctors ( British Museum: London 1938 ) Gospels ) 11 ] the work of the New Testament copy... Matthew 6:15 ( More on this in a link below b D 56 58 700, Matthew the... The corrector does appear in over a thousand other Greek manuscripts scribe and the Codex:! All? & quot ; a link below Sinaiticus text, the Codex Sinaiticus the!
Grayson County Police Reports, Ayuda Entre Hermanos Tj Busquemos Perlas Escondidas, Is Beau Of The Fifth Column A Veteran, Articles D